Government Crack Down on Use of Contractors
The legal landscape regarding the use of independent contractors has dramatically changed over the past several years. For decades, employers’ use of independent contractors was not only rarely challenged, but it was also a way they could save significantly on labor and other costs associated with hiring employees. In this tough economy, employers may be tempted to use the services of independent contractors instead of employees in order to reduce their bottom-line costs. However, now more than ever, employers need to be extra careful in this area since both state and federal agencies are cracking down on what they believe is the widespread and improper use of independent contractors.
By way of example, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has recently made the misclassification of workers one of its top priorities. President Obama’s proposed 2011 budget for the DOL includes an additional $25 Million for what he characterizes as the “Misclassification Initiative.” In this regard, it is expected that the DOL will hire an additional 100 enforcement personnel to investigate claims of misclassifying workers as independent contractors.
The Internal Revenue Service is also taking the misclassification of employees seriously. The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently concluded that employee misclassification is a “significant problem” because it reduces tax revenues flowing to the federal government. In fact, the GAO estimates that over $7 Billion in payroll taxes will be lost over the next ten years. Needless to say, the IRS does not take this loss in revenue lightly and has notified the public that, commencing in 2010, it will increase its employer tax audits with the specific purpose of determining whether employers are misclassifying workers as independent contractors.
States around the country have also seen this as a significant issue. Illinois, New York, Maryland, Colorado and Delaware, to name a few, have either increased penalties for improperly classifying workers as independent contractors or have passed laws specifically designed to penalize employers for misclassifying workers. There has even been legislation pending in Congress, which was sponsored a former Illinois Senator named Barack Obama, called the Independent Contractors Proper Classification Act, that would restrict an employer’s ability to classify a worker as an independent contractor. Specifically, it would grant workers the right to petition the Secretary of Treasury for a determination of their status as employees or independent contractors and obligate employers to provide notice to workers of their right to seek a determination. Simply put, the issue of misclassifying workers is not going away anytime soon.
Unfortunately for employers, there is no single test to ascertain whether a worker should be classified as an employee or an independent contractor. And, to make matters worse, different state and federal agencies utilize different tests and standards in this regard. However, common scenarios that raise red flags to governmental agencies are:
- Individuals classified as independent contractors who perform the same kind of work or duties that employees also perform for the business;
- Individuals classified as independent contractors who perform work that is essential to the services or work of the business;
- Arrangement where the independent contractor either dedicates all his or her time to the business or is restricted from performing services for other businesses;
- Individuals designated as independent contractors who perform work for which other businesses in the same industry use employees.
In light of the foregoing, all employers must properly evaluate whether any current workers are appropriately classified as independent contractors and, if necessary, change the classification to comply with current federal and state law. For a more detailed discussion of the benefits, risks and other issues related to the use of independent contractors, please contact E. Jason Tremblay and/or request a copy of the Employment Law Toolkit that he recently authored.
Related posts:
Leave a Reply
Top Authors
Andrew LaCivita
Posts: 7Kirk Baumann
Posts: 6Jason Tremblay
Posts: 5Kevin O'Brien
Posts: 5Harold Mills
Posts: 4Coley Perry
Posts: 4Nick Fishman
Posts: 3Joel Passen
Posts: 3Karen Bucks
Posts: 3Bradley Savoy
Posts: 3Greg Savage
Posts: 3Christine Nicholl
Posts: 2Heather R. Huhman
Posts: 2Peter Parks
Posts: 2Hire Plateau
Posts: 2
Top Posts
The Difference Between High Volume and High Complexity Recruiting
Since When is a Person a Commodity?
Government Crack Down on Use of Contractors
3 Sure Fire Ways to Get Kicked off a Vendor List
Managing Your Hiring Managers, Part I
Resume & Interview – R.I.P. ???
Hire Plateau with Greg Jarecki
3 Tools to Improve the Quality of Hires
I’m Sorry, But Today’s Job Boards are Broken
Treating Your Employees as Replaceable is Costing You
Part I-Top Five Reasons to “Get Social”: The Candidate View
How to Hire a Great Recruiter
Managing Your Hiring Managers, Part II
SOWs: Get More from your VMS (Part 1)
Do Candidates Think You Represent a “Best Company to Work For”?







Google “neufeld memo”… Any comments on how hard the new guidelines are being enforced? I’m hesitant to use any 3rd party H1B consultants until I understand better how this is being handled.
I am not too familiar with the Neufeld Memo (so I am unfamiliar withhow hard it is currently being enforced). However, as long as you are truly treating any H1B worker that you hire as an employee (e.g., controlling what they do, withholding taxes, providing them their equipment, etc.), you should have too much to worry about asin this regard. I have a book that has a chapter that goes into a little more detal than my post that I would be happy to send you if you would like.