SOWs: Get More from your VMS (Part 1)
One of, if not the, hottest topics in the VMS / MSP world is SOW (“Services Procurement” or “Projects”). (Click here for definitions.) It appears to me that the primary driver for the excitement is the considerable spend in this category. Customers and providers recognize that it is like “leaving money on the table” to implement a VMS technology and leave a significant share of your services spend outside the system.
So, we are starting to see more companies incorporating services procurement / SOW spend into their MSP or VMS program. But too often the vision is limited to getting the spend into the system. Unlike the traditional contingent workforce process, where over a decade of focus has resulted in best practices, process improvement and innovation, SOW spend remains largely a sacred cow, not an area where innovation is welcome or even allowed.
When planning to introduce SOW into a program, companies often document precisely how the process is run today and send it to their providers with the message, “call us when you have enabled this exact process in the technology and program”. In most cases, this is not one process but a lengthy list of processes by department, or even down to the individual project manager level.
Why do organizations fail to apply the same scrutiny to the existing SOW processes that they routinely apply to their own contingent or T&M (time and materials) spend? A few reasons I have experienced are:
- The user communities in SOW and traditional contingent workforce do not overlap.
- The programs are often initiated by stakeholders primarily responsible for contingent spend only.
- SOW has been a “black box” and has developed an almost mystical reputation; “their processes are so complex and so specialized – they do things in there that no one else understands”.
Well, it is possible to review SOW spend before it is introduced into the program and apply the same examination of process, supply base, rates and best practice to be performed across the board. Instead of using your VMS as a repository for deals that have already been struck through the mystical process, use it as the tool it is designed to be used. In my next post in this series, I’ll share some practical ways for you to stop leaving money on the table and inprove your services procurement process.
This post was syndicated with approval from author. The original post can be seen on the Provade Blog.
Related posts:
Leave a Reply
Top Authors
Andrew LaCivita
Posts: 7Kirk Baumann
Posts: 6Jason Tremblay
Posts: 5Kevin O'Brien
Posts: 5Harold Mills
Posts: 4Coley Perry
Posts: 4Nick Fishman
Posts: 3Joel Passen
Posts: 3Karen Bucks
Posts: 3Bradley Savoy
Posts: 3Greg Savage
Posts: 3Christine Nicholl
Posts: 2Heather R. Huhman
Posts: 2Peter Parks
Posts: 2Hire Plateau
Posts: 2
Top Posts
The Difference Between High Volume and High Complexity Recruiting
Since When is a Person a Commodity?
Government Crack Down on Use of Contractors
3 Sure Fire Ways to Get Kicked off a Vendor List
Managing Your Hiring Managers, Part I
Resume & Interview – R.I.P. ???
Hire Plateau with Greg Jarecki
3 Tools to Improve the Quality of Hires
I’m Sorry, But Today’s Job Boards are Broken
Treating Your Employees as Replaceable is Costing You
Part I-Top Five Reasons to “Get Social”: The Candidate View
How to Hire a Great Recruiter
Managing Your Hiring Managers, Part II
SOWs: Get More from your VMS (Part 1)
Do Candidates Think You Represent a “Best Company to Work For”?







Trackbacks & Pingbacks